Last week of term and our piece: 
So the last week of term came around really fast, and on the last lesson on the Friday we prepared to perform our piece to 4 random audience members.
Mr. Fearnehough did explain to our audience that this was a work in progress and it still had a lot of work doing to it before it would be completely ready for perform. So I thought that our piece was a success in total. Our Frantic Assembly scene was by far our best scene because we had spent the most time working on it because it required lifts and other moves that could be dangerous if not done properly.
I feel that if we used more of our time to focus on scene transitions and how we were going to incorporate the effects into our piece then it may have run smoother than the final product did.
For my personal section of this task, that being the lighting and projection. I feel this part was partly successful, but also did not accomplish what I originally intended it to do.
My use of the follow spot light I feel went well, we were able to use it well in our Frantic Assembly piece. The blue light added to the overall effect that this created and I thought it was successful from both a design and directorial point of view.

Some audience comments about how the piece went:

I believe the piece was intended to shock the audience and possibly scare or even alienate them.

The group did manage to convey this successfully by changes in sound and tension state. It thought it worked but could have been more exaggerated

The costume was black, so there wasn't much of an impact (which I thought of as a good thing as it allowed me to focus on the acting more) The masks made me feel uncomfortable and added to the general atmosphere of nightmares

If the piece was supposed to be about nightmares, including me really made me feel part of the nightmare. It felt more real being included.

As you can see from these audience comments, our piece did set out to do some of the things that we had intended for it to do. The fact that the piece was intended to shock the audience was portrayed well, and it even came across as though it was to alienate the audience which was good feedback to hear.
Also as explained above they say that including them in the nightmare made it feel more real. This was a major part of what we were trying to achieve so I am glad that we managed to do that.

A servant and two masters - Directors Notebook.

A brief summary on what the play is about would go along the lines of it being about a servant who deceives his TWO masters into thinking that he is being loyal to only one of them.

My initial thoughts on reading this play was that it took me quite a while to get the plot. I had finally figured out everything that was going on by about the start of Act 2. One thing that took me a while to figure out were the different characters. One character that I didn't seem to like was Truffaldino, he seemed to be a tricky and quite devious character that almost made it seem like they wanted you to hate him.

Main characters that are involved in the play:
  • Smeraldina
  • Beatrice
  • Brighella
  • Silvio
  • Truffaldino
  • Clarice 
  • Florindo 
  • Dr Lombardi 
  • Pantaloon
But the ones involved in my scene are:
  • Silvio
  • Dr Lombardi 
  • Pantaloon





Our performance: 

We finally had a chance to perform our performance to an audience. Despite not having practiced for a long time, I think it went surprisingly okay. We did miss certain key lines and parts such as, the closing and opening of doors on the train, the falling asleep on the train and saying "who am I?" In Emmas nightmare, however for a first draft I didn't think we did all that badly. After asking the audience what they thought about the piece they said that they enjoyed the piece however they didn't really get the storyline. I think this was the case because we missed out the falling asleep part. We also needed to work on cues a lot more because in lots of parts there were just awkward silences where we didn't know what to say. However I think the Frantic assembly part went well and the building of the plane in the second nightmare. A few of the audience members said that the plane nightmare was their favourite part. I thought actually performing to an audience was extremely different to just practising without an audience as a lot of our piece has audience involvement. By actually performing the piece we now have a better idea of what we need to improve/work on.



Initial reactions to the play:

I found the play really interesting to read as it wasn't predictable like lots of plays. When I first started reading it I had no idea that Beatrice and Florindo were 'innamorati' so it was interesting to see how their relationship developed as the play continued. I really didn't like Truffaldino as a character as I felt that there was no story behind wanting to mess with Beatrice and Florindo. I get that he was based off the Comedia Dell Arte stock character Arlecchino who is the servant who likes tricking people, but in this play I really didn't like his character, and didn't find him all that funny. However although I didn't like Truffaldino, I did quite like the story with him and Brighella and how that caused him to have to tell his masters the truth.

Analysis: 

A Servent to two masters is the story of a man who decieves his masters into thinking that he is only serving one of them, he uses this power to meddle in their lives and cause trouble not only for them but for another couple as well. In the end he is found out, however it is unclear what exactly happens to him.

A servant to two masters is about deception and how it can effect the lives of others and your own.

The characters: 

  • Clarice 
  • Florindo 
  • Dr Lombardi 
  • Pantaloon
  • Smeraldina
  • Beatrice
  • Brighella
  • Silvio
  • Truffaldino

The locations: 

  • Pantaloons house
  • Brighellas Inn 
  • Outside Brighellas inn
Genre & Style: 

Done in the style of Comedia Dell Arte, although slightly adapted as Comedia Dell Arte never has a s script. This changed the way Comedia Dell Arte was looked at (killed it)

My interpretation: 

For me a servant to two masters is about honesty and how if you aren't honest it can not only effect others lives but also your own. I think it was written in order to provoke a reaction towards Truffaldino, and make people think more about their own lives.

Research: 

Carlo Goldoni's life:
Carlo Goldoni was an Italian playwright who grew up in Venice. He claims that it was his grandfather who introduced him to theatre. His father did not want him to have anything to do with theatre and therefore sent him to a very strict school in attempt to get him to do something else with his life. However he spent most of this time reading greek and latin comedies. He was later expelled from this school. For a while he became a lawyer, however after his father died he moved to Milan and then Verona where he devoted himself to writing plays. He was helped by the playwright Giuseppe Imer. 

When was the play written? 
1743 







Fourni par Blogger.